Court Administrator
Steve Lancaster
Court Administrator

Media Contact
Martin DeAgostino
Communications Director
Information for the Press

Pho: 317.234-4859
Fax: 317.233.4627
martin.deagostino@courts.in.gov

Filing Information

Where to file...

Clerk of the Appellate Courts
200 W. Washington St.
216 State House
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Filing Guidelines

Clerk's Office Website

Court of Appeals of Indiana > Oral Arguments > Indiana Court of Appeals -- Oral Arguments in Zionsville Indiana Court of Appeals -- Oral Arguments in Zionsville

Zionsville High School

The Court has enjoyed the hospitality of Zionsville Community High School three times since 2000.  We thank the attorneys for their capable advocacy and the staff and students at Zionsville Community High School for their gracious reception.

Zionsville Community High School
1000 Mulberry Street
Zionsville, IN  46077
(317) 873-3355
(317) 873-8002 [fax]
http://www.zcs.k12.in.us/zchs/index.htm
Principal:  Jim Eggers
Enrollment: 1,538

J.W. v. State
March 18, 2005

Panel:

  • Judge Patrick D. Sullivan
  • Judge John G. Baker
  • Judge Melissa S. Mattingly

Lutz v. Indianapolis
December 7, 2004

Panel:

  • Judge John G. Baker
  • Judge Margaret G. Robb
  • Judge Terry A. Crone

Davidson v. Perron
September 11, 2001

Panel:

  • Judge John G. Baker
  • Judge Ezra H. Friedlander
  • Judge James S. Kirsch

Oral argument was conducted in this case on September 11, 2001 at Zionsville High School in Zionsville, Indiana. This court wishes to thank the Boone County Bar Association and the students, faculty, and staff of Zionsville High School for their graciousness in hosting that proceeding. We are especially appreciative of the efforts and attentiveness of all involved in light of the tragic events unfolding elsewhere in our nation on that day. In view of those events, some thought was given at the time to rescheduling the oral argument. However, that proceeding was held in conjunction with the year-long Centennial Celebration of the Court of Appeals of Indiana, and therefore special events and arrangements surrounding the oral argument had been scheduled and implemented. Even communicating the decision to postpone in a timely fashion to everyone involved would have been impossible. Moreover, as Presiding Judge Baker explained to the attendees at the outset of oral argument on that fateful day, our country’s strength is such that even an attack of such terrible magnitude does not prevent our justice system from conducting its business. Still, our thoughts and best wishes were then, and remain, with all of those who suffered as a result of the attacks and their aftermath.